Wireless camera
Next, I'd like a wifi TV. So I easily can watch on my TV stuff that I download on my computer.
(Hattip: Instapundit.)
b
Thoughts on journalism, culture and boatbuilding
Judges know very well how to read the Constitution broadly when they are sympathetic to the right being asserted. We have held, without much ado, that "speech, or . . . the press" also means the Internet, and that "persons, houses, papers, and effects" also means public telephone booths. When a particular right comports especially well with our notions of good social policy, we build magnificent legal edifices on elliptical constitutional phrases--or even the white spaces between lines of constitutional text. But, as the panel amply demonstrates, when we’re none too keen on a particular constitutional guarantee, we can be equally ingenious in burying language that is incontrovertibly there.Great point. Too bad he voted in the minority.
It is wrong to use some constitutional provisions as spring-boards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us. As guardians of the Constitution, we must be consistent in interpreting its provisions. If we adopt a jurisprudence sympathetic to individual rights, we must give broad compass to all constitutional provisions that protect individuals from tyranny. If we take a more statist approach, we must give all such provisions narrow scope. Expanding some to gargantuan proportions while discarding others like a crumpled gum wrapper is not faithfully applying the Constitution; it’s using our power as federal judges to constitutionalize our personal preferences...
It is wrong to use some constitutional provisions as spring-boards for major social change while treating others like senile relatives to be cooped up in a nursing home until they quit annoying us. As guardians of the Constitution, we must be consistent in interpreting its provisions. If we adopt a jurisprudence sympathetic to individual rights, we must give broad compass to all constitutional provisions that protect individuals from tyranny. If we take a more statist approach, we must give all such provisions narrow scope. Expanding some to gargantuan proportions while discarding others like a crumpled gum wrapper is not faithfully applying the Constitution; it's using our power as federal judges to constitutionalize our personal preferences. . . ."
Obviously if you are reading this then I have died in Iraq. I kind of predicted this, that is why I'm writing this in November. A third time just seemed like I'm pushing my chances. I don't regret going, everybody dies but few get to do it for something as important as freedom. It may seem confusing why we are in Iraq, it's not to me. I'm here helping these people, so that they can live the way we live. Not have to worry about tyrants or vicious dictators. To do what they want with their lives. To me that is why I died. Others have died for my freedom, now this is my mark.The part in bold is what the New York Times printed in this story. The rest, they chose to leave out.
What we don't need to do is to spend more money now and worry about how to pay for it later. In the House, we're working on a plan that will include off-sets to pay for any additional spending, eliminate wasteful and inefficient government programs and cuts mandatory spending. But it will keep tax relief in place so that we can create jobs and continue to grow the economy.What's really great is that I read that from his blog. It'll be interesting to see how often he updates it.
Well if you are reading this, then things didn't go well for me over in Iraq. I'm sorry for the pain that I have caused you because of this. Please do not be upset with the Marine Corps, the military, the government, or the President. It was my choice to go into the military. The President and my higher commanders were just doing what they thought was best. Realize that I died doing something that I truly love, and for a purpose greater than myself.Marine Capt Ryan A. Beaupre died in a helicopter crash in Kuwait on March 30, 2005. Read the whole letter.
Mahmoud Ahmadi-Nejad, Iran’s fundamentalist president, on Wednesday declared that Israel should be “wiped off the map” and warned Arab countries against developing economic ties with Israel in response to its withdrawal from Gaza.Good thing Iran doesn't have a device capable of wiping Israel off the map. Of course, the Iranians just want to develop nuclear power plants, nothing more.
His remarks, delivered at a conference in Tehran entitled “A World without Zionism”, led to diplomatic protests by the UK, France and Spain, while Shimon Peres, Israel’s deputy prime minister, said Iran should be expelled from the United Nations.
The photo of Condoleezza Rice that originally accompanied this story was altered in a manner that did not meet USA TODAY's editorial standards.
The Republicans promised to change the culture. Democrats sold panic. "Don't vote for them! They're going to shrink government and take away your favorite programs!" They needn't have worried. The Republicans got elected, but if the Democrats' goal was to expand the government, they were the real winners.Read the whole column.
Upon careful consideration, I've decided to bring back the phrase: "Mel, Kiss My Grits." Please try to support this effort in your own personal interactions.
... Rosa Parks. Not an activist or a radical. Just a quiet, conservative, churchgoing woman with a nice family and a decent job as as a seamstress. For all the eloquent phrases that have been turned about her place in the flow of history, she did not get on that bus looking for trouble or trying to make a statement. Going home was all she had in mind, like everybody else. She was anchored to her seat by her own dignity. Rosa Parks simply wasn't going to be a "nigger" for anybody anymore. And all she knew to do was to sit still...Take any seat in the house.
... I imagine the moment when she signs in with the angel at the pearly gates in heaven. "Ah, Rosa Parks, we've been expecting you. Make yourself at home -- take any seat in the house."
Just reread Edgar Allen Poe's "The Cask of the Amontillado." A great short story. The last lines are chilling. Fortunato cries out for mercy as Montressor places the final brick in his living tomb:"For the love of God, Montressor!"But I wonder. Did his heart grow sick because of remorse or because he could no longer hear the torment of Fortunato?
"Yes," I said, "for the love of God!"
But to these words I hearkened in vain for a reply. I grew impatient. I called aloud —
"Fortunato!"
No answer. I called again —
"Fortunato!"
No answer still. I thrust a torch through the remaining aperture and let it fall within. There came forth in return only a jingling of the bells. My heart grew sick — on account of the dampness of the catacombs. I hastened to make an end of my labor. I forced the last stone into its position; I plastered it up. Against the new masonry I re-erected the old rampart of bones. For the half of a century no mortal has disturbed them. In pace requiescat!
The president pro tem of the Senate got his $230 million bridge, but only after he threatened to quit if he didn't.To the editors and writers of the NY Times and the Post, the Coburn amendment wasn't even worthy of a brief.
Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska, the chamber's senior Republican, became furious when Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican, offered an amendment yesterday that would have forbidden building the bridge and sent some of the money to rebuild the Interstate 10 bridge across Lake Pontchartrain, which was damaged by Hurricane Katrina.
Figures for age, sex, race, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents' propensity to be online. In theory, with probability samples of this size, one can say with 95% certainty that the overall results have a sampling error of +/- 2 percentage points of what they would be if the entire U.S. adult population had been polled with complete accuracy.If that's the case, then the headline writer was justified in using the term public. I apologize for calling the editors' objectivity into question. Kudos to the Wall Street Journal Online team for being so quick to update this.
Labels: Bad Polls, Media Bias
Here's the photo of Michelle Kosinski, the Today Show reporter caught in a canoe in a foot of water. The more I think about it, this really captures the moral ineptness that has befallen today's journalism. Makes me wonder what other crearly amoral decisions journalists are making everyday. Labels: journalism ethics
It seems to me that this makes it an especially good project for bloggers to get behind, and to encourage their senators to support. I expect that quite a few people in Congress are worried about this, and will be trying to ensure that it does a quiet death rather than coming to the floor for a vote. I think the country is better off with transparency, and I'd like to hear any Senator who opposes this measure explain why he or she favors funding a bridge that could buy a personal jet for every inhabitant of Gravina Island, instead of spending the money on fixing ruined bridges that people actually use in Louisiana. They won't want to talk about that, of course, but they need to be asked.I'll call my representatives tomorrow and see what they think of it.
[I]t's interesting to see how many people are now pretending (1) that Miller's WMD/Iraq reporting didn't start until the Bush Administration's war buildup, when actually it goes back to the 1990s; and (2) that nobody else thought that we'd find vast WMD stockpiles when we invaded, when in fact everyone thought we would. (The valuable lesson for would-be Saddams -- don't run a bluff against the United States -- is also lost).
Just 6 weeks after Hurricane Katrina, top Republicans are exploiting the cost of the tragedy to push forward a budget plan calling for $50 billion in permanent cuts to vital services for the poor and middle-class, while handing out $70 billion in tax breaks -- largely for the wealthy.Here's a list of some of the proposed cuts. I'm pretty sure the $6 million saved by cutting the "Jobs in the Woods Program" won't be hurting any "vulnerable Americans." Some treehuggers? Perhaps.
The budget fight begins this week, starting with the proposed cuts to services like Medicare, Medicaid, pension insurance, and student loans. In the next few days, Congress will make decisions dramatically affecting millions of the most vulnerable Americans. They must know their constituents are watching.
I'm listening to Bram Stoker's "Dracula" on tape. It's really a good novel. Of course, I had to read the wikipedia entry to learn about the origins of Stoker's book and the vampire mythology -- quite interesting. Certainly Stoker did find the name Dracula in his reading on Romanian history. This became a replacement for the name Count Wampyr, which he had intended to use for his villain. Recently, however, many Dracula scholars led by Elizabeth Miller have questioned the connection's depth. It now seems likely that Stoker knew little of Vlad himself, other than the name Dracula by which he called himself.The best argument against a connection is simple: If Stoker knew a lot of Vlad the Impaler, he probably would have worked some impaling into the story.
It is certainly the case that the media narrative is much more sensational than the Senate report. A story about malfeasance is perhaps more interesting than a story about incompetence. A story about deliberate White House deception is perhaps more interesting than a story about bureaucratic miscommunication. A story about retaliation is perhaps more interesting than a story about clarification.
Labels: journalism ethics
Insurgents attacked five of Baghdad's 1,200 polling stations with shootings and bombs, wounding seven voters, but there were no major attacks reported as U.S. and Iraqi forces clamped down with major security measures around balloting sites.Today's a great day for Iraq and the spread of democracy in the Middle East. I offer my thanks to members of the military who helped make it happen.
It appears members of Congress have gotten their ducks in a row. Instapundit noted earlier that several lawmakers have released statements calling on fiscal discipline. Washington, DC – Congressman Tom Price (GA-6) issued the following statement today regarding the need for fiscal discipline:A notable lack of any hard numbers, but at least he's saying the right things. A few weeks ago, few representatives in Washington were talking about fiscal discipline. Now, lawmakers are stumbling over themselves to brandish their carving knives. The variable in that equation is the blogging community; I think we should all be pleased.
"Recent tragic events that have occurred in the Gulf region have given us a great opportunity to refocus our efforts to end wasteful government spending I am committed to identifying and cutting wasteful Washington spending."
"Washington is not accustomed to fiscal discipline. Finding savings and prioritizing programs is necessary if we are going to gain control of our national debt. While all Americans have shown compassion for the victims of recent natural disasters, we must exercise this compassion in a fiscally responsible manner. We must not stick our children and grandchildren with the tab."
"Throughout this Congressional session and before the hurricanes devastated the Gulf region, I supported and voted for a series of amendments to the House appropriations bills that would save one percent of all discretionary spending – sadly these amendments routinely fail. Furthermore, I support and have co-sponsored three bills that would make permanent a 1, 2, or 5 percent across-the-board savings in non-defense, non-homeland-security discretionary spending for fiscal year 2006."
"Washington demonstrates time and again that it is incapable of financial responsibility. The need for a Balanced Budget Amendment has never been more clear. I am an original co-sponsor of this legislation and will continue to work for its serious consideration and passage. I do not believe spending restraint will occur without this important tool. It’s time has finally come."
"Tough times call for tough choices – today is a time we must all look long and hard at our spending priorities. Americans are a compassionate people and we are all committed to helping victims of crises in the Gulf region and elsewhere. We should also be committed to finding savings for hardworking American taxpayers so that we may responsibly pay for these efforts. The time to act is now. We must not leave record deficits for future generations because we did not seize this opportunity to enact fiscal discipline when it was needed most."
I started with the premise that this war was extremely important, whether or not many people agreed. While I hear radio and television crews often lamenting about how it takes a whole day just to file one story, it can take me two weeks of dangerous research, photography and writing to get a single major dispatch out. I am not a war correspondent or journalist. I am only a writer who came to Iraq after it became apparent that we might be in trouble, and I did not trust the news. I had never covered a war before and, with any luck, never will again.On the Green Zone:
... The International Zone was previously called "The Green Zone." Green usually means safe, but the place is dangerous and people die there often. A car bomb exploded at a gate there just days ago, killing several people. People have been kidnapped and murdered there. Sometimes bombs have exploded inside the IZ, splattering bits of body parts on the ground. There is nothing Green about it...On the media and the hostile media effect:
... It's easy to take shots at "the media" in IraqÂliterally, as well as for the quality of their coverage. Forget for a moment the lopsided expense versus returns ratio. The bullet holes in the hotel rooms and the picnic tables in the desert tell a back story about why so few journalists make the journey. All this, while knowing that insurgents have specifically targeted members of the media.On the effects of war:
Apparently the terrorists like it better when fewer reporters are around to peel back the layers of their insurgent press machine and reveal its rotten core. The Americans may think they get bad press, but apparently the terrorists think they get worse. Everybody, it seems, is a victim of bad press, including (ironically) the professionals who print it, because they get shot by everybody, with words and bullets...
... By about 10 a.m., credentials in hand, I was heading out for a helicopter to my final destination. As I struggled with the cumbersome gear -- I don't pack light to war anymore -- I saw a CNN reporter sitting on the floor downstairs from the CPIC office. Although we'd never met, I recognized her from television. I'd just spent thirty or more hours with tired reporters, and frustrated reporters, and bored reporters. But this reporter looked to be in a state of despair.Good luck, Michael.
Since I was rushing to get to a helicopter, there was no chance to even say hello. I asked my Army escort about the reporter sitting on the floor. According to the officer, she'd been through a lot lately, traveling with Marines out in Al Anbar province, where they had been involved in some long days of combat. She'd been living like a Marine. I recalled how she looked tired and rattled when those reports aired. On one taped interview, when she clearly expressed doubts about staying in Iraq; the fatigue and fear seemed to have grabbed her. Keeping up with Marines in combat is not easy. Marines are Marines.
"Alcohol, bikinis, that kind of thing makes Muslims angry. Don’t do that when visiting a country with a Muslim majority,” he said. “I’m sorry, Australian culture makes war on morality. They come to Bali with bikinis, they make war on morality. Not physical war, morality war. Respect the culture and religion of Indonesia."By the way, Blair's talking about the Bali terrorist blasts that killed 20 people less than 2 weeks ago. How many Americans realize there's been another bombing in Bali? How many remember the first one? Hard to convince some people that we're still at war.


CAMP BLUE DIAMOND, AR RAMADI, Iraq – U.S. Army Soldiers conducting a cordon and search operation near Anah , approximately 300 km northwest of Baghdad, discovered one of the largest munitions caches to date in western Al Anbar Province yesterday.Good work, Marines.
The Soldiers from 4th Squadron, 14th Cavalry Regiment, assigned to Regimental Combat Team-2, were searching a car bomb factory that was destroyed by Coalition air strikes recently, when they noticed freshly moved dirt. A twenty-foot storage container was uncovered after several minutes of digging.
More than 1,000 122 mm artillery rounds were discovered, along with approximately 40,000 armor piercing bullets, 1,000 .50 caliber rounds, detonation cord and various bomb-making materials.
After the cache site was destroyed, more munitions were found buried nearby. Explosive ordnance specialists are supervising the removal and destruction of these munitions, which are typically used to make roadside bombs that injure and kill innocent Iraqi civilians and military personnel.
This latest cache is the 26th cache found in the last week by 2nd Marine Division forces conducting counter-insurgency operations in the Al Anbar Province.
When Al-Qaida's zealots blow up trains in Spain or subways in London, those are attacks of their choosing conducted on "infidel terrain." The genius of the war in Iraq is a brutal but necessary form of strategic judo: It brought the War on Terror into the heart of the Middle East and onto Arab Muslim turf. In Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's theo-fascists have been spilling Arab blood, and Al Jazeera has noticed that, too.
People-- I KNOW what is wrong with me. I am dying.
I have a couple of simple choices: pay the quacks all the money I have to keep me alive a little longer, or face the inevitable and save my money for my children. I choose door #2.
One of Iraq's main Sunni Arab parties will endorse the country's new constitution in Saturday's crucial referendum, a spokesman has said.
I can honestly tell you I was shocked today to see a story on CBSNews.com headlined, “McCain Eyes ’08 White House Run.” Shocked not from the revelation but from the fact someone actually thought it to be “news.” I don’t blame the Web site and I don’t blame the New York Daily News scribe who originally reported it or the AP writer who picked it up. I blame an overall media culture steeped in hype and a paint-by-the-numbers approach to political coverage.
Bloggers would "probably not" be considered journalists under the proposed federal shield law, the bill's co-sponsor, U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar (R.-Ind.), told the Inter American Press Association (IAPA) Monday afternoon.To the credit of the journalism profession, they oppose the government defining who's a journalist:
A key reason some journalists oppose the popular federal shield proposal is fear that giving Congress the power to define who is and isn't a journalist could lead effectively to the licensing of journalists.
In other remarks about the legislation at IAPA's 61st General Assembly, Lugar acknowledged that the legislation could amount to a "privilege" for reporters over other Americans.
"I think, very frankly, you can make a case that this is a special boon for reporters, and certainly for their role in freedom of the press," he said. "At the end of the day what we will come out with says there is something privileged about being a reporter, and being able to report on something without being thrown into jail."
Ongoing military operations continue unabated in al-Anbar province. With names like 'Operation Iron Fist' and 'Operation Iron Gate' which was launched just days after 'Iron Fist,' thousands of US troops, backed by warplanes, tanks and helicopters, began attacking small cities and villages primarily in the northwestern area of al-Anbar.Several points. First off, I can't imagine that anyone thinks the "corporate media" is actually presenting a favorable impression of what's going on in Iraq. All I read everyday is a death toll with no context representing the overall progress. My view is shared by numerous military bloggers who feel the press is doing an incredibly poor job representing Iraq. But, according to Truthout, the media are not doing enough to express what a dishonorable job the military is doing in Iraq.
According to the US military and corporate media, the purpose of these operations is to "root out" fighters from al-Qaida in Iraq, along with so-called insurgents.
An Iraqi journalist writing under the name Sabah Ali (due to concerns of retribution from US/Iraqi governmental authorities) recently returned from the al-Qa'im area of Iraq. Her report tells quite a different story.
… The Post, I believe, is our great national newspaper now; the Times is number two, with the Wall Street Journal close behind. Still a strong fleet. With a new ship in the lead perhaps it will sail to unexpected places.I'd put the WSJ in the top spot, but let's not quibble.
Seems like a pretty clear First Amendment violation, especially given Florida Star v. B.J.F. If it's unconstitutional to bar speakers from revealing the names of rape victims when those names were accidentally released by government officials into the public record, I'd think that it would be unconstitutional to bar speakers from revealing the names of rapists when those names were deliberately placed by government officials into the public record.
Rep. Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, chairman of the House Budget Committee, called on Thursday for across-the-board spending cuts and urged lawmakers to increase the savings Republicans hope to gain from a budget bill this fall to a minimum of $50 billion, from $35 billion.If I could only get my own representatives on board.
“We’d better get started, and we’d better do it now,” Nussle said.
But Carville added that no one in Washington likes anyone who is right too often. Howard Dean’s accurate assessment about the failure of the war in Iraq helped kick him out of the running for president despite his passion, Carville said.If that's an accurate portrayal of what he said, I'd say that's a pretty poor assessment of what doomed Dean's candidacy. I'd say it was more for his likelihood to say stupid things.

But some extremely important elements of American Democracy have been pushed to the sidelines. And the most prominent casualty has been the "marketplace of ideas" that was so beloved and so carefully protected by our Founders. It effectively no longer exists.Al Gore just gave a speech this morning in New York. I just read it in Georgia. I'm now commenting that I think Al Gore is crazy.
Perhaps current practices are producing a treasure trove of intelligence that this bill would stop, but I doubt that -- and if I'm wrong, the Administration should make that case to Congress, not stand on executive prerogatives.
Robert Hanson, the last surviving member of the Memphis Belle crew, just died. He was 85. But the main point--which I made about Katrina and other things--is for all of us, namely that there is no prize for being wrong first. I am not impressed that everyone has an opinion. In fact, most of the time it is a mistake to have an opinion early on. Does anyone in the general rant know much of anythng about Miers as an intellect? About her core beliefs, if indeed she has any? I don't think so. She may be a drooling idiot, or a scintillating mind and personality, or just a boring mediocrity. Who knows? We don't, at least not yet. But we will. When we know, we're entitled to lecture one another, but not yet. Take it easy. I'm old enough to remember people screaming that the stupid haberdasher, Harry Truman, wasn't qualified to be president--surely George Will, on his current performance, would have agreed--and the same sort of people were thrilled that a real Harvard intellect, surrounded by other great Harvard intellects, had defeated the wretched Nixon for the presidency.
Furthermore, there is no reason to believe that Miers' nomination resulted from the president's careful consultation with people capable of such judgments. If 100 such people had been asked to list 100 individuals who have given evidence of the reflectiveness and excellence requisite in a justice, Miers' name probably would not have appeared in any of the 10,000 places on those lists.
Suicide victims don't normally accumulate a large amount of bomb-making material in their homes. People intent on blowing up other people do.Accoding to some reports, the guy recently converted to Islam and may have attended the same mosque as Moussaoui. According to this news search, no one except Oklahoma news outlets (and oddly, ESPN) have been covering the story. The larger media outlets need to cover this story and quit buying the "emotional difficulties" line.

The president's statement today is a mistake. Appeasement of a dictatorship simply invites further attempts at intimidation. Standing with democratic Taiwan would secure stability in East Asia. Seeming to reward Beijing's bullying will not.
More recently, a major news agency's website lead read: "Suicide Bomber Kills Six in Baghdad" and "Seven Marines Die in Iraq Clashes." True, yes. Comprehensive, no. Did the author of this article bother to mention that Coalition troops killed 50 or so terrorists while incurring those seven losses? Of course not. Nor was there any mention about the substantial progress these offensive operations continue to achieve in defeating the insurgents. Unfortunately, this sort of incomplete reporting has become the norm for the media, whose poor job of presenting a complete picture of what is going on in Iraq borders on being criminal.
First, not being a judge, in itself, doesn't seem like that big a deal to me. Many law profs who get nominated to the bench have never been judges. And more relevant to this case, there's been a reasonably broad bipartisan call in recent years to get 'a politician' on the Court. And the whole point, in that case, is that the person not come from the bench or even be too deeply entrenched in the legal profession. Finally, as we've seen, pretty often it turns out that these nominees have only been circuit court judges for maybe a year or two prior to their appointment. And in the grand scheme of things, that amounts to little more than a bit of batting practice before going up to the plate.

The real leadership deficit on Capitol Hill is one of ideas, not ethics. In the absence of any policy ambitions, Congress has drifted and the Democrats' ethics complaints have filled the vacuum. The one thing Republicans did pass and then brag about during the August recess--the $286 billion highway bill--has now boomeranged as its 6,371 "earmarks" have been exposed as petty and self-serving after Katrina. This is what happens when Republicans try to become the party of government.Agree.